While the high-octane drama of Formula 1 often steals the spotlight, a significant political contest is quietly unfolding away from the track, one that will determine the leadership of global motorsport`s governing body. The presidency of the Fédération Internationale de l`Automobile (FIA) is set for election in December, and the race has commenced with notable intensity.
The current president, Mohammed Ben Sulayem, is seeking a second four-year term at the helm. His path to re-election is now formally challenged by Tim Mayer, an American figure with extensive experience in motorsport administration, including a tenure as a Formula 1 steward and senior roles within US racing organizations.
The announcement of Mayer`s challenge brings a layer of personal history to the forefront. It was revealed last Friday, coinciding with a major F1 race weekend, that Mayer intends to stand against the incumbent. Notably, Ben Sulayem removed Mayer from his role as an F1 steward just last November. While Mayer states his challenge isn`t driven by “revenge,” he acknowledges his dismissal prompted a period of reflection on “the state of the FIA.”
This reflection appears to have led to sharp criticism. Mayer has reportedly accused President Ben Sulayem of overseeing a “reign of terror” within the organization. Furthermore, he has suggested that the current leadership presents merely an “illusion of inclusion” while power is increasingly centralized.
Ben Sulayem`s response to these potent accusations, at least initially, was one of dismissal. When presented with the “reign of terror” claim, he indicated he “just laughed.” He framed such accusations as typical tactics often seen in election campaigns, particularly drawing a parallel to the sometimes confrontational nature of politics in the United States. He asserted that this style was “not my style” and that the approach was “up to him.” Ben Sulayem also specifically countered the allegations regarding a lack of genuine inclusion and the concentration of power.
Understanding this election requires looking beyond the immediate F1 paddock. The FIA president is not elected by the Formula 1 teams or management, but by the 245 global member clubs that constitute the federation, representing both motorsport and mobility interests. This diverse electorate means the political landscape is complex, and support bases can differ significantly across regions.
Formula 1, the pinnacle of FIA`s sporting portfolio, formally maintains a neutral position in the election. This neutrality was perhaps underscored by Mayer`s decision to launch his campaign at a hotel located near the British Grand Prix venue, rather than directly within the bustling and politically sensitive paddock area where he spent time that weekend.
Commentary on the state of the race suggests Ben Sulayem retains popularity among many member federations, particularly in areas like South America, potentially placing him in a strong starting position. However, the situation is fluid. Some figures who previously supported Ben Sulayem are now reportedly among his critics. Speculation also exists regarding potential endorsements for Mayer from individuals who previously held senior roles within Ben Sulayem`s administration.
Ultimately, Tim Mayer faces a significant challenge in unseating the incumbent. While other notable figures in motorsport were considered potential candidates, they ultimately decided against running. With sharp words exchanged right from the beginning, the path to the December 12th vote promises a period of intense political maneuvering within the often-quiet structure of global motorsport governance. Whether it`s a true “reign of terror” or just the opening salvo in an electoral contest, the battle for the FIA presidency has certainly begun with a bang.
